研究生workshop由首都经济贸易大学国际经济管理学院主办。主要内容：一是研究生报告前沿或经典文献，二是研究生报告自己的研究或研究设想。论坛宗旨是：为学院师生搭建一个学术交流平台，营造浓厚学术氛围；通过对经典论著或前沿文献的研讨，拓宽研究生的理论视野，提升研究生的前沿方法运用能力，帮助研究生提高论文写作质量。

本期workshop

第二组报告人1：顾睿豪，博士2024级

导师：黄宗晔

报告题目：Does Entrepreneurship Pay?An Empirical Analysis of the Returns to Self-Employment,Journal of Political Economy,2000,Barton H.Hamilton

摘要: Possible explanations for earnings differentials in self-employment and paid employment are investigated. The empirical results suggest that the nonpecuniary benefits of self-employment are substantial: Most entrepreneurs enter and persist in business despite the fact that they have both lower initial earnings and lower earnings growth than in paid employment, implying a median earnings differential of 35 percent for individuals in business for 10 years.The differential cannot be explained by the selection of low-ability employees into self-employment and is similar for three alternative measures of self-employment earnings and across industries. Furthermore, the estimated earnings differentials may understate the differences in compensation across sectors since fringe benefits are not included in the measure of employee compensation.

报告人2：黄婷，博士2024级

导师：高逸尘

报告题目：学区房溢价的影响因素:教育质量的视角，《金融研究》，2021，张勋、寇晶涵、张欣、吕光明

摘要：优质教育资源可能形成于学校的教育质量，也可能来源于生源质量。房地产的市场化定价机制为探讨优质教育资源的背后形成机制提供了便利。本文利用北京市二手房成交数据，采用特征价格模型和边界固定效应法，估算了学区房溢价。在此基础上，利用学校层面的教育质量信息，探讨了教育质量对学区房溢价的解释力。实证结果表明，以学校物质资本和教师人力资本所表征的教育质量是学区房溢价，即优质教育资源的主要来源，解释了总体学区房溢价的64. 71% ，这种解释力在考虑了潜在的内生性问题后依旧稳健。进一步通过量化北京市的三个教育强区( 西城区、东城区和海淀区) 中教育质量的解释力，发现优质教育资源既可形成于优质生源集聚，也可形成于教育经费投入长期累积所带来的教育质量的提升。义务教育均衡化改革，推动优质公共投入的公平供给，是平抑高企的学区房价格的有效手段。